"Do No Harm": An Evaluation of the Courts’ Decision-Making Policies in Overruling Children & Families’ Refusal of Treatment
Date
2017
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of English and Writing, The University of Tampa
Abstract
The purpose of this research paper is to prove why the courts
have the authority to overrule families’ and children’s refusal of potentially
life-saving treatment. The author describes the decision-making policies and
laws used to guide judges’ decisions and justify their rulings. The case of
Cassandra C., a seventeen-year-old minor diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma,
helps demonstrate how these policies are practiced in the courtroom.
Court cases, particularly the case of Daniel Hauser, are used as evidence to
describe why the court’s actions are warranted even in cases in which treatment
is refused based on a family’s religious values. The courts’ decisions
are ultimately justified since legislation’s primary initiative is to protect the
greater welfare of society. After proving that the courts’ decisions are warranted,
the author suggests that legislatures adopt the harm principle, contrary
to the best interest standard, to not only justify court intervention,
but also to clarify the circumstances necessary for involvement. With support
from professionals in this field of study, the author also encourages legislators
to implement the constrained parental autonomy model as opposed to the
mature minor doctrine. By employing the harm principle and constrained
parental autonomy model, the author argues that these decision-making laws
will clarify when court intervention is justified, and thus cause less conflict
in the courtroom.
Description
Recommended Citation: Ross, Kayleigh. “‘Do No Harm’: An Evaluation of the Courts’ Decision-Making Policies in Overruling Children & Families’ Refusal of Treatment.” Royal Road, 2017. https://doi.org/10.48497/49QC-YK07.
item.page.type
Article
item.page.format
Keywords
Court cases, Patient refusal of treatment, Legislation, Best interest standard, Harm principle, Mature minor doctrine, Ethics
Citation
Ross, Kayleigh. “‘Do No Harm’: An Evaluation of the Courts’ Decision-Making Policies in Overruling Children & Families’ Refusal of Treatment.” Royal Road, 2017. https://doi.org/10.48497/49QC-YK07.